Cell phone indicating increased productivity

Hiring vs. Automation: Cost Comparison for Modern Clinics

December 02, 20253 min read

Hiring vs. Automation: Cost Comparison for Modern Clinics


Introduction: Rising Clinic Costs Are Forcing a New Choice

Across the country, clinics are facing the same pressure:

  • higher patient call volume

  • staffing shortages

  • rising wages

  • increased operational overhead

For clinics running on Tebra, eClinicalWorks, ModMed, NextGen, or Athena, front-desk performance directly affects revenue — because every missed call is a missed appointment.

The two most common solutions look like this:

  1. Hire more staff or extend hours

  2. Use automation to capture calls, schedule appointments, and reduce administrative burden

This article compares the true cost of each approach and breaks down why AI reception is quickly becoming the operational standard for clinics that need reliable, round-the-clock coverage.


The Real Cost of Hiring Additional Front-Desk Staff

Hiring is familiar — but it’s also expensive and less scalable than many clinics expect.

Typical Costs Per Full-Time Front-Desk Staff Member

  • Base salary: $33,000–$48,000/year

  • Benefits + employer taxes: $8,000–$12,000/year

  • Training + onboarding: $1,500–$3,000

  • Turnover replacement (national average 38–42%): $4,000–$6,000 per departure

Annual cost per staff member:
$45,000–$65,000+

And that’s just one individual who can only answer one call at a time.

After-Hours or Weekend Coverage

If clinics want extended hours:

  • overtime pay

  • split shifts

  • staggered staffing

  • or hiring a second FTE

These push annual staffing costs well above $80,000.
Still limited, still human-dependent, still vulnerable to sick days and burnout.


Call Centers: Coverage, But at a Premium

Call centers are the traditional fallback for clinics that cannot staff a 24/7 front desk.

Costs

  • Monthly contracts: $2,000–$6,000+

  • Per-minute charges

  • Long-term agreements

  • Additional fees for on-call paging, bilingual agents, and overflow handling

Annual cost:
$24,000–$72,000+

Operational Issues

While call centers solve “being available,” they create new problems:

  • long hold times

  • inconsistent call quality

  • high patient frustration

  • no real-time EHR updates

  • frequent message errors

  • delayed scheduling

Call centers answer, but they don’t operate your clinic’s workflow.


AI Front Desk Automation: Lower Cost, Higher Coverage

AI reception replaces the bottleneck entirely.

A modern AI receptionist like MedCalls provides:

  • 24/7/365 coverage

  • instant call answering

  • unlimited simultaneous calls

  • scheduling, rescheduling, cancellations

  • clinical routing

  • follow-ups and reminders

  • direct integration with major EHRs

Most importantly, it operates at a fraction of staffing or call center costs.

Typical AI Reception Cost (MedCalls Model)

Priced monthly based on call volume — not salaries or per-minute fees
No long-term contracts
No onboarding or training costs
No turnover losses

Most clinics see savings of $30,000–$60,000/year compared to hiring and $20,000–$40,000/year compared to call centers.


How Automation Works Inside Existing EHR Systems

A major reason clinics choose MedCalls is because it works inside the EHR they already rely on, including:

  • Tebra

  • eClinicalWorks

  • ModMed

  • NextGen

  • Athena

  • other major providers

This avoids the biggest cost driver in healthcare operations:
manual entry, double handling, and delayed information flow.

With direct integration, MedCalls can:

  • verify or update patient appointments

  • schedule in real-time

  • route calls to the correct provider or department

  • handle cancellations instantly

  • reduce admin workload by hours per day

Staff stay focused on patient care while automation handles the predictable communication.


ROI: Where AI Creates Immediate Savings

Clinics switching to automation typically see:

1. Reduced labor costs

Replacing after-hours and overflow coverage instantly cuts major staffing expenses.

2. More booked appointments

AI picks up every call — and every appointment call becomes revenue.

3. Fewer no-shows

Automated reminders and confirmations reduce lost time slots.

4. More efficient staff

Teams no longer spend hours returning voicemails or re-entering schedule changes.

5. Higher patient satisfaction

Immediate answering + accurate scheduling = fewer complaints and better retention.


Conclusion: Automation Outperforms Hiring in Every Category Except One

Hiring provides human warmth — something no AI will fully replace.
But for answering calls, booking appointments, routing issues, and protecting staff workload, AI delivers:

  • higher coverage

  • lower cost

  • fewer errors

  • faster response times

  • direct EHR workflow compatibility

  • no turnover

  • no training

  • no staffing shortages

Clinics using Tebra, eClinicalWorks, ModMed, NextGen, and Athena already have robust EHR infrastructure.
MedCalls builds on that foundation and replaces the most expensive operational bottleneck: the front desk.


Ready to See Your Cost Breakdown?

Book a consultation:
https://medcalls.ai/consultation

Explore EHR Integrations:
https://medcalls.ai/ehr-integrations

View Pricing:
https://medcalls.ai/pricing

Back to Blog